Invoice audit
ShipBob
Coverage
$341.70 of $358.95
95.19% of invoice spend was priced against your contract. $17.25 (4.81%) could not be audited.
Your rate card does not price return processing ($3.75 on 1 line); insurance ($1.50 on 1 line) — $5.25 of spend (1.46%) with no contracted rate to check it against. It is reported here and claimed nowhere; add the governing rate-card page or amendment through an authorized audit workspace to extend coverage.
The remaining $12.00 of the coverage gap is other unsupported or unmapped spend; its data-quality entries below identify what must be resolved before that spend can be evaluated.
Evidence posture
- Claim-ready$0.00
- Review required / not established$1.65
Only claim-ready has passed the persisted evidence policy. Review required / not established means one or more claim-readiness proofs are still missing — such as certified parser layout, source integrity, reconciliation, complete billing mechanics, refutation, or an open dispute window — so these remain review evidence and are not a claim.
Under examination, never claimed: $25.00. Verification-required, optimization and rate-drift dollars are candidates for review, never claims, and are never added to the claim-ready total (§6.9).
Deterministic variance candidates (publication review required)
4 findings · 4 issuesClaim-ready $0.00; $1.65 review required / not established (one or more claim-readiness proofs are still missing — such as certified parser layout, source integrity, reconciliation, complete billing mechanics, refutation, or an open dispute window — so these remain review evidence and are not a claim).
Shipping/Per Pick Fee1 line$1.00 review varianceReview candidate — Line 3 ('Shipping: Per Pick Fee — 4 additional picks @ $0.25') duplicates line 2 on invoice 'INV-88101' — the same economic event appears more than onceShow the 1 evidenced lineHide the evidence
“Invoice disputes must be raised in writing within sixty (60) days of the invoice date; invoices not disputed within this period are deemed accepted.”
- Evidence state: REVIEW_REQUIRED
- Claim-readiness blockers: CITATIONS_NOT_RESOLVED, CLASS_NOT_ENABLED, DOCUMENT_NOT_RECONCILED, DUPLICATE_IDENTITY_NOT_ELIGIBLE, DUPLICATE_SCOPE_NOT_ELIGIBLE, EVIDENCE_NOT_BOUND_TO_FINDING, EVIDENCE_NOT_BOUND_TO_ORGANIZATION, LAYOUT_UNSUPPORTED, PROOF_OBLIGATIONS_INCOMPLETE, REFUTATION_NOT_UPHELD, SOURCE_INTEGRITY_NOT_VERIFIED
- Deadline: Open to dispute until 4 September 2026
- Verification id: 612069aadaa9
- Billed / expected: $1.00 vs $0.00 across 2 invoice lines
- Possible next step after review: request a credit of 1.00 USD for the duplicated line
| Invoice | Line | Evidence state | Description | Qty | Billed | Expected | Variance | Arithmetic | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INV-88101 | 3, 2 | REVIEW_REQUIRED | Shipping: Per Pick Fee — 4 additional picks @ $0.25 / Shipping: Per Pick Fee — 4 additional picks @ $0.25 | 4, 4 | $1.00 | $0.00 | $1.00 | identity match on (code 'Shipping/Per Pick Fee', description 'Shipping: Per Pick Fee — 4 additional picks @ $0.25', amount 100 USD (minor units), order 'BP-2003', provider ref 'Shipment:384210013', quantity 4, unit amount 25 minor units, event date 2026-07-06); the anchor line already bills the event, so the duplicate's expected amount is 0.00 USD; mechanical certainty: provider reference 'Shipment:384210013' identifies one shipment; the identical charge (same code, description, quantity, unit rate and amount) is billed against it twice on one invoice | table s1.t1, cell E4, table s1.t1, cell E3 |
Shipping/B2B - Each Pick Fee1 line$0.30 review varianceReview candidate — Billed $0.35 per pick, contract states $0.30 — across 6 picks on 1 invoice line.Show the 1 evidenced lineHide the evidence
“Invoice disputes must be raised in writing within sixty (60) days of the invoice date; invoices not disputed within this period are deemed accepted.”
Cited: page 2 of your rate card
- Evidence state: REVIEW_REQUIRED
- Claim-readiness blockers: CITATIONS_NOT_RESOLVED, CLASS_NOT_ENABLED, DOCUMENT_NOT_RECONCILED, EVIDENCE_NOT_BOUND_TO_FINDING, EVIDENCE_NOT_BOUND_TO_ORGANIZATION, LAYOUT_UNSUPPORTED, PROOF_OBLIGATIONS_INCOMPLETE, REFUTATION_NOT_UPHELD, SOURCE_INTEGRITY_NOT_VERIFIED
- Deadline: Open to dispute until 4 September 2026
- Verification id: 612069aadaa9
- Billed / expected: $2.10 vs $1.80 across 1 invoice line
| Invoice | Line | Evidence state | Description | Qty | Billed | Expected | Variance | Arithmetic | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INV-88101 | 4 | REVIEW_REQUIRED | Shipping: B2B - Each Pick Fee — 6 picks @ $0.35 | 6 | $2.10 | $1.80 | $0.30 | 0.30/UNIT (PER_OCCURRENCE) x 6 = 1.80 USD; corroboration: line states 0.35 USD x 6 = 2.10 USD, equal to the billed amount | table s1.t1, cell E5 |
Shipping/B2B - Label Fee1 line$0.25 review varianceReview candidate — Billed $2.00 per label, contract states $1.75 — across 1 label on 1 invoice line.Show the 1 evidenced lineHide the evidence
“Invoice disputes must be raised in writing within sixty (60) days of the invoice date; invoices not disputed within this period are deemed accepted.”
Cited: page 2 of your rate card
- Evidence state: REVIEW_REQUIRED
- Claim-readiness blockers: CHECK_NOT_ELIGIBLE, CITATIONS_NOT_RESOLVED, CLASS_NOT_ENABLED, DOCUMENT_NOT_RECONCILED, EVIDENCE_NOT_BOUND_TO_FINDING, EVIDENCE_NOT_BOUND_TO_ORGANIZATION, LAYOUT_UNSUPPORTED, PROOF_OBLIGATIONS_INCOMPLETE, REFUTATION_NOT_UPHELD, SOURCE_INTEGRITY_NOT_VERIFIED
- Deadline: Open to dispute until 4 September 2026
- Verification id: 612069aadaa9
- Billed / expected: $2.00 vs $1.75 across 1 invoice line
- Possible next step after review: the billed unit rate 2.00 matches rule rr_gldsb_b2b_label_2026h1 (effective [2026-01-01 .. 2026-06-30]), which is not the active rule on 2026-07-06; request rebilling at rule rr_gldsb_b2b_label_2026h2's rate
| Invoice | Line | Evidence state | Description | Qty | Billed | Expected | Variance | Arithmetic | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INV-88101 | 5 | REVIEW_REQUIRED | Shipping: B2B - Label Fee — 1 label @ $2.00 | 1 | $2.00 | $1.75 | $0.25 | 1.75/PACKAGE (PER_OCCURRENCE) x 1 = 1.75 USD; corroboration: line states 2.00 USD x 1 = 2.00 USD, equal to the billed amount | table s1.t1, cell E6 |
Shipping/Per Pick Fee1 line$0.10 review varianceReview candidate — Billed $0.30 per pick, contract states $0.25 — across 2 picks on 1 invoice line.Show the 1 evidenced lineHide the evidence
“Invoice disputes must be raised in writing within sixty (60) days of the invoice date; invoices not disputed within this period are deemed accepted.”
Cited: page 2 of your rate card
- Evidence state: REVIEW_REQUIRED
- Claim-readiness blockers: CITATIONS_NOT_RESOLVED, CLASS_NOT_ENABLED, DOCUMENT_NOT_RECONCILED, EVIDENCE_NOT_BOUND_TO_FINDING, EVIDENCE_NOT_BOUND_TO_ORGANIZATION, LAYOUT_UNSUPPORTED, PROOF_OBLIGATIONS_INCOMPLETE, REFUTATION_NOT_UPHELD, RULES_NOT_MERCHANT_CONFIRMED, SOURCE_INTEGRITY_NOT_VERIFIED, UNRESOLVED_ASSUMPTIONS
- Deadline: Open to dispute until 4 September 2026
- Verification id: 612069aadaa9
- Billed / expected: $0.60 vs $0.50 across 1 invoice line
- Assumption: NOT_MERCHANT_CONFIRMED lifted by invoice-internal corroboration (§6.4)
| Invoice | Line | Evidence state | Description | Qty | Billed | Expected | Variance | Arithmetic | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INV-88101 | 1 | REVIEW_REQUIRED | Shipping: Per Pick Fee — 2 additional picks @ $0.30 | 2 | $0.60 | $0.50 | $0.10 | 0.25/UNIT (PER_OCCURRENCE) x 2 = 0.50 USD; corroboration: line states 0.30 USD x 2 = 0.60 USD, equal to the billed amount | table s1.t1, cell E2 |
Verification required
3 findings · 3 issuesPositive variance in this class: $25.00 — candidates for review, never claims, and never added to the claim-ready total. Of that, $0.00 sits inside an open dispute window, $0.00 is time-barred and $25.00 has no established window.
uncategorized charge1 line$25.00 review varianceReview candidate — Promised credit pc_gld_002 (25.00 USD, promised 2026-05-15, reference 'BP-1999') does not appear on any subsequent statement through 'INV-88003'Show the 1 evidenced lineHide the evidence
Cited: page 2 of your rate card
- Evidence state: REVIEW_REQUIRED
- Claim-readiness blockers: CHECK_NOT_ELIGIBLE, CITATIONS_NOT_RESOLVED, CLASS_NOT_ENABLED, DOCUMENT_NOT_RECONCILED, ENGINE_NOT_VERIFIED, EVIDENCE_NOT_BOUND_TO_FINDING, EVIDENCE_NOT_BOUND_TO_ORGANIZATION, LAYOUT_UNSUPPORTED, PROOF_OBLIGATIONS_INCOMPLETE, REFUTATION_NOT_UPHELD, SOURCE_INTEGRITY_NOT_VERIFIED, UNRESOLVED_ASSUMPTIONS
- Deadline: Open to dispute until 29 August 2026
- Verification id: 612069aadaa9
- Billed / expected: $0.00 vs -$25.00 across 0 invoice lines
- Assumption: resolving evidence: the provider's confirmation of where the credit was applied, or its appearance on the next statement
- Possible next step after review: request issuance of the documented 25.00 USD credit, quoting: 'A $25.00 goodwill credit for the mis-shipped order BP-1999 will appear on your next statement.'
| Invoice | Line | Evidence state | Description | Qty | Billed | Expected | Variance | Arithmetic | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | REVIEW_REQUIRED | — | $0.00 | -$25.00 | $25.00 | expected credit -25.00 USD; observed 0.00 — unresolved variance 25.00 USD | — |
Return/AdditionalFee1 lineno claimObservation — Not priced by your rate card: $3.75 of spend across 1 line. No amount is claimed.Show the 1 evidenced lineHide the evidence
No contract clause on file for this charge — which is why nothing here is stated as owed.
- Evidence state: OBSERVATION
- Claim-readiness blockers: CHECK_NOT_ELIGIBLE, CITATIONS_NOT_RESOLVED, CLASS_NOT_ENABLED, DOCUMENT_NOT_RECONCILED, ENGINE_NOT_VERIFIED, EVIDENCE_NOT_BOUND_TO_FINDING, EVIDENCE_NOT_BOUND_TO_ORGANIZATION, LAYOUT_UNSUPPORTED, NON_POSITIVE_VARIANCE, PROOF_OBLIGATIONS_INCOMPLETE, REFUTATION_NOT_UPHELD, SOURCE_INTEGRITY_NOT_VERIFIED, UNRESOLVED_ASSUMPTIONS
- Verification id: 612069aadaa9
- Billed: $3.75 across 1 invoice line; no rule on file prices it, so no expected amount was computed
- Assumption: resolving evidence: an amendment or rate-card page authorizing the charge, or the provider's written justification
- Possible next step after review: ask the provider to cite the contract term authorizing this charge or to credit it
| Invoice | Line | Evidence state | Description | Qty | Billed | Expected | Variance | Arithmetic | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INV-88105 | 1 | OBSERVATION | Return: AdditionalFee — Return processing: 1 unit @ $3.75 | 1 | $3.75 | $3.75 | $0.00 | billed 3.75 USD; the rule set defines no rate for the code or category — no dollars are claimed | table s1.t1, cell E10 |
Shipping/Insurance1 lineno claimObservation — Not priced by your rate card: $1.50 of spend across 1 line. No amount is claimed.Show the 1 evidenced lineHide the evidence
No contract clause on file for this charge — which is why nothing here is stated as owed.
- Evidence state: OBSERVATION
- Claim-readiness blockers: CHECK_NOT_ELIGIBLE, CITATIONS_NOT_RESOLVED, CLASS_NOT_ENABLED, DOCUMENT_NOT_RECONCILED, ENGINE_NOT_VERIFIED, EVIDENCE_NOT_BOUND_TO_FINDING, EVIDENCE_NOT_BOUND_TO_ORGANIZATION, LAYOUT_UNSUPPORTED, NON_POSITIVE_VARIANCE, PROOF_OBLIGATIONS_INCOMPLETE, REFUTATION_NOT_UPHELD, SOURCE_INTEGRITY_NOT_VERIFIED, UNRESOLVED_ASSUMPTIONS
- Verification id: 612069aadaa9
- Billed: $1.50 across 1 invoice line; no rule on file prices it, so no expected amount was computed
- Assumption: resolving evidence: an amendment or rate-card page authorizing the charge, or the provider's written justification
- Possible next step after review: ask the provider to cite the contract term authorizing this charge or to credit it
| Invoice | Line | Evidence state | Description | Qty | Billed | Expected | Variance | Arithmetic | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INV-88101 | 6 | OBSERVATION | Shipping: Insurance — Declared value coverage | — | $1.50 | $1.50 | $0.00 | billed 1.50 USD; the rule set defines no rate for the code or category — no dollars are claimed | table s1.t1, cell E7 |
Optimization opportunities
2 findings · 2 issuesNo dollars are claimed in this class.
Shipping/Insurance1 line$0.00 review varianceObservation — Invoice 'INV-88001' bills 1.50 USD of per-package insurance/declared-value fees, recurring across 2 statements (3.00 USD observed in total); whether external cargo/inventory coverage exists has not been recorded — if it does, this recurring charge is paid twiceShow the 1 evidenced lineHide the evidence
“Invoice disputes must be raised in writing within sixty (60) days of the invoice date; invoices not disputed within this period are deemed accepted.”
- Evidence state: OBSERVATION
- Claim-readiness blockers: CHECK_NOT_ELIGIBLE, CITATIONS_NOT_RESOLVED, CLASS_NOT_ENABLED, DISPUTE_WINDOW_NOT_ESTABLISHED, DOCUMENT_NOT_RECONCILED, ENGINE_NOT_VERIFIED, EVIDENCE_NOT_BOUND_TO_FINDING, EVIDENCE_NOT_BOUND_TO_ORGANIZATION, LAYOUT_UNSUPPORTED, NON_POSITIVE_VARIANCE, PROOF_OBLIGATIONS_INCOMPLETE, REFUTATION_NOT_UPHELD, SOURCE_INTEGRITY_NOT_VERIFIED, UNRESOLVED_ASSUMPTIONS
- Deadline: The deadline passed on 9 August 2026 — use it in your next rate talk
- Verification id: 612069aadaa9
- Billed / expected: $1.50 vs $1.50 across 1 invoice line
- Assumption: resolving evidence: the merchant's confirmation of external cargo/inventory coverage overlapping the provider's per-package insurance
- Possible next step after review: ask the merchant whether an external cargo/inventory policy covers stored and shipped goods; if yes, request opt-out of the provider's per-package insurance
| Invoice | Line | Evidence state | Description | Qty | Billed | Expected | Variance | Arithmetic | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INV-88001 | 2 | OBSERVATION | Shipping: Insurance — Declared value coverage | — | $1.50 | $1.50 | $0.00 | sum of the statement's insurance lines; no dollars are claimed — validity depends on the merchant's coverage answer | table s1.t1, cell E3 |
Shipping/Insurance1 line$0.00 review varianceObservation — Invoice 'INV-88101' bills 1.50 USD of per-package insurance/declared-value fees, recurring across 2 statements (3.00 USD observed in total); whether external cargo/inventory coverage exists has not been recorded — if it does, this recurring charge is paid twiceShow the 1 evidenced lineHide the evidence
“Invoice disputes must be raised in writing within sixty (60) days of the invoice date; invoices not disputed within this period are deemed accepted.”
- Evidence state: OBSERVATION
- Claim-readiness blockers: CHECK_NOT_ELIGIBLE, CITATIONS_NOT_RESOLVED, CLASS_NOT_ENABLED, DOCUMENT_NOT_RECONCILED, ENGINE_NOT_VERIFIED, EVIDENCE_NOT_BOUND_TO_FINDING, EVIDENCE_NOT_BOUND_TO_ORGANIZATION, LAYOUT_UNSUPPORTED, NON_POSITIVE_VARIANCE, PROOF_OBLIGATIONS_INCOMPLETE, REFUTATION_NOT_UPHELD, SOURCE_INTEGRITY_NOT_VERIFIED, UNRESOLVED_ASSUMPTIONS
- Deadline: Open to dispute until 4 September 2026
- Verification id: 612069aadaa9
- Billed / expected: $1.50 vs $1.50 across 1 invoice line
- Assumption: resolving evidence: the merchant's confirmation of external cargo/inventory coverage overlapping the provider's per-package insurance
- Possible next step after review: ask the merchant whether an external cargo/inventory policy covers stored and shipped goods; if yes, request opt-out of the provider's per-package insurance
| Invoice | Line | Evidence state | Description | Qty | Billed | Expected | Variance | Arithmetic | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INV-88101 | 6 | OBSERVATION | Shipping: Insurance — Declared value coverage | — | $1.50 | $1.50 | $0.00 | sum of the statement's insurance lines; no dollars are claimed — validity depends on the merchant's coverage answer | table s1.t1, cell E7 |
Rate drift (implied baseline — no contract on file)
0 findings · 0 issuesNo dollars are claimed in this class.
No findings were emitted in this class for this run. This says nothing about evidence outside the stated audit coverage.
Provider-favorable variances
0 findings · 0 issuesNet variance in the provider's favor: $0.00. Reporting stance only — no merchant claim.
No findings were emitted in this class for this run. This says nothing about evidence outside the stated audit coverage.
Data-quality issues
1 finding · 1 issueNo dollars are claimed in this class.
Additional Fee/Special Handling1 line$0.00 review varianceObservation — Provider charge code 'Additional Fee/Special Handling' on line 7 ('Additional Fee: Special Handling — One-time special handling surcharge') is unmapped after alias resolution (no matching category) — the charge cannot be audited until an alias or merchant override maps itShow the 1 evidenced lineHide the evidence
“Invoice disputes must be raised in writing within sixty (60) days of the invoice date; invoices not disputed within this period are deemed accepted.”
- Evidence state: OBSERVATION
- Claim-readiness blockers: CHECK_NOT_ELIGIBLE, CITATIONS_NOT_RESOLVED, CLASS_NOT_ENABLED, DOCUMENT_NOT_RECONCILED, ENGINE_NOT_VERIFIED, EVIDENCE_NOT_BOUND_TO_FINDING, EVIDENCE_NOT_BOUND_TO_ORGANIZATION, LAYOUT_UNSUPPORTED, NON_POSITIVE_VARIANCE, PROOF_OBLIGATIONS_INCOMPLETE, REFUTATION_NOT_UPHELD, SOURCE_INTEGRITY_NOT_VERIFIED, UNRESOLVED_ASSUMPTIONS
- Deadline: Open to dispute until 4 September 2026
- Verification id: 612069aadaa9
- Billed / expected: $12.00 vs $12.00 across 1 invoice line
- Assumption: resolving evidence: an alias-table entry or merchant override mapping the provider code to a §6.5 category
- Possible next step after review: map the provider charge code (merchant override or alias), then re-audit the line
| Invoice | Line | Evidence state | Description | Qty | Billed | Expected | Variance | Arithmetic | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INV-88101 | 7 | OBSERVATION | Additional Fee: Special Handling — One-time special handling surcharge | — | $12.00 | $12.00 | $0.00 | billed 12.00 USD; no expected amount exists — no dollars are claimed | table s1.t1, cell E8 |